River pollution and mining law

In both the northern and southern mines farms were dug up and large tracts of arable land washed into sluice boxes in the quest for gold. Whole towns were moved so the locations where they had been built could be mined. But in 1851, along Nevada City’s Main Street, several miners planted themselves in the center of town determined to dig up the roadway for gold. A shopkeeper whose business would have been seriously affected put up a protest but the miners cited the superiority of the mines under the law, as was the custom at the time. The shopkeeper then went back to his store, picked up the biggest pistol he could put his hands on, and then returned to the street. He was soon was able to convince the miners that the public streets were more valuable to the area than mines and so a precedent was set that no one could squat on the city thoroughfares.

Hydraulic mining, washing down the bank into the sluice

Similar events happened in other places throughout the mines, but the powerful mining interest generally kept its dominance over agriculture in the legal battle for land use. Most of the productive crops and orchards were grown in places where there was no reason to mine. But over the next twenty-five years or so, while the rivers and streams were being filled and thousands of acres of productive farmland destroyed by the silt, sand and gravel dumped into them from hydraulic mining, the agriculture industry was gaining importance in the economy of the state far surpassing what the mines had ever enjoyed. A desperate struggle between miners and farmers was eminent. By 1880 it was estimated that over a hundred million cubic yards of debris and slickens from hydraulic operations had been washed into the Yuba River, raising its bed seventy feet in some places and destroying or damaging up to twenty thousand acres of the best farmland around.

Yuba River Slickens 2001

Yuba City is in the lower left. The Yuba Goldfields, debris carried down from the Sierra foothills during the California Gold Rush, is the large gray area along the river.

In 1866 congress acknowledged the mining laws already in force and began to perfect and unify the system on mining law. Meanwhile both mine owners and farmers were seeking clear title to their holdings so that when the final battle was fought both sides would be owners of their respective property. The California courts had already decided that property owners had rights to metals and minerals on their land and could protect themselves against other claimants. In the end, it was the now powerful farmers who brought suit to enjoin the mining companies from polluting the streams with their refuse and in 1884 the Supreme Court ruled in favor of agriculture. A miner could no longer cover the agricultural land of another with any material, either directly or indirectly, that would render it useless or valueless.

John Putnam is the author of Hangtown Creek, a thrilling saga of the early California gold rush available in paperback, kindle and nook formats.

This entry was posted in Gold rush justice, Mining Law and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>